A former Australian Army commander and counter-terrorism expert from the University of Canberra has publicly challenged the federal government’s position following the deadly Bondi terror attack, rejecting claims that public pressure for further inquiry could compromise national security.
The attack — widely described as one of the most devastating acts of terror on Australian soil — continues to spark intense national debate. The former commander argued that discouraging public appeals under the banner of “national security” is, in his view, “a smokescreen for corruption,” insisting that Australians deserve full transparency.
He is calling for an urgent Royal Commission, saying only an independent, wide-ranging inquiry can determine whether systemic failures occurred and ensure accountability at every level. “Justice and public safety must come before political convenience,” he reportedly stated.
The criticism places increased pressure on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the Albanese government, which has so far stopped short of announcing a Royal Commission. Supporters of the government argue that existing investigative processes are underway and that sensitive intelligence matters require careful handling.
Adding to the momentum, former Army Chief Peter Leahy also released a statement expressing strong concerns about transparency and oversight. His remarks reportedly resonated widely, with many Australians voicing support for a deeper independent investigation.
The debate now centers on a critical question: should the government launch a Royal Commission to examine the attack in full public view, or rely on existing mechanisms to deliver answers?
As calls for accountability grow louder, the political and national security implications of this tragedy continue to unfold — and the demand for clarity shows no sign of fading.