⚖️ Kelly Attorney Urges DOJ Not to Re-Indict Lawmakers Over Military Video

An attorney for Sen. Mark Kelly is urging U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro and Attorney General Pam Bondi not to pursue a second indictment against a group of Democratic lawmakers over a video advising service members to disregard “illegal orders.” 📩

In a letter obtained by NBC News, Kelly’s attorney Paul Fishman warned that convening another grand jury would represent a “remarkable abuse” of Justice Department authority, arguing there is no factual or legal basis for prosecution.

⚖️ Grand Jury Previously Declined to Indict

Earlier this month, a grand jury declined to indict the lawmakers after prosecutors failed to meet the required probable cause threshold.

Those initially targeted included Sens. Kelly and Elissa Slotkin, as well as Reps. Jason Crow, Maggie Goodlander, Chris Deluzio, and Chrissy Houlahan.

Slotkin’s attorney, Preet Bharara, stated that the grand jury “spoke loudly, clearly, and unanimously,” cautioning that continued pursuit could conflict with DOJ ethical standards and established prosecutorial policy.

🎥 Video at Center of Controversy

The dispute centers on a November video in which the lawmakers told military members, “You can refuse illegal orders,” encouraging them not to “give up the ship.” 🇺🇸

Supporters argue the statement reflects longstanding military law principles requiring service members to reject unlawful commands, while critics contend the message could undermine discipline within the armed forces.

🏛️ Broader Legal and Political Implications

The case highlights ongoing tensions between elected officials and the U.S. Department of Justice, raising questions about prosecutorial discretion, First Amendment protections, and the limits of political speech involving the military.

As debate continues, legal observers are watching closely to see whether federal prosecutors will move forward with another attempt at indictment.

📌 Stay updated on developments surrounding the DOJ review and potential next steps in the case.